![]() ![]() Even CDJs are more responsive, and IMO a Pioneer 800 beats the pants off of Torq, no contest. With Torq, it constantly feels like things aren't happening quite when they should be. It really "feels" like you're compensating for a few MS lag, as opposed to Traktor and Serato, where the lag is so minimal you don't end up noticing it at all after your first mix. Torq, in my experience, is laggy, in that the movement of the records doesn't translate as well as it does in Serato or Traktor. It was actually much better when you had the old one that you could boot to a dedicated Linux that ran it that was absolutely rock-solid, and I managed to run it fine on my old laptop off the CD, and my old laptop was a Celeron 550 w/160 megs of ram. The new Traktor takes too much CPU, you need an insane rig to run it smoothly. Out of the bunch, Serato hands-down beats all of them IMO. I've got friends with all three of them Torq, Serato and Traktor Scratch. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |